Subject	I kind of assumed, Brad, that your post had an implied
Posted by	240Z FeO2 on September 15, 2007 at 2:12 PM
	This message has been viewed 43 times.
In Reply To	Uhh... posted by BradZ (FL) on September 15, 2007 at 02:38 AM
Message	point of reference that insiders (people who know what a USDM ecu/bracket looks like) would understand. Hence, even though a difference was not shown in your post, you could state there was one. So, yes, my point was merely semantic and was not directed at all toward your clever ecu mounting solution. Chance favors the informed
Follow Ups	What's different about this pic? - BradZ (FL) 22:54:52 09/14/07 Water damage? (n/m) - resorb (NJ) 23:00:39 09/14/07 Bracket is for a RHD Z (n/m) - SilverTwin(OH) 23:01:25 09/14/07 ding. (n/m) - BradZ (FL) 23:08:01 09/14/07 wow...eagle eyes (n/m) - apostrophe28 23:21:28 09/14/07 LMAO @ your sig. Priceless!! - 91Z32TT 23:25:32 09/14/07 LOL - ashman2k2 01:00:22 09/15/07 I thought for something to be 'different" a comparison or - 240Z FeO2 01:16:55 09/15/07 ...touche (n/m) - apostrophe28 01:17:42 09/15/07 jesus (n/m) - collegeboy 01:17:42 09/15/07 lol (n/m) - jaku 14:13:09 09/15/07 Uhh... - BradZ (FL) 02:38:08 09/15/07 He's just arguing semantics, not that you didn't change it (n/m) - JBender 03:35:08 09/15/07 I kind of assumed, Brad, that your post had an implied - 240Z FeO2 14:12:54 09/15/07 I never knew there was a difference. - rojoloco (Yokosuka, Japan) 06:24:05 09/15/07 hmm never knew that.. soo how long did it take you to catch? - fst300zx 08:13:36 09/15/07 ahhahaha ur sig is the best (n/m) - Drk93TT 08:46:27 09/15/07 It gets me everytime. (n/m) - zleepertt(MD) 09:51:04 09/15/07
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.